Posts tagged ‘anassemblysuchasthis’

February 26th, 2010

An Interview with Pamela Aidan!

by Madeleine Rex

I recently (well, it was a while back, but it took forever to write the reviews) interviewed Pamela Aidan, author of the Fitzwilliam Darcy, Gentlemen trilogy. (To read my reviews for all three books, click.) Aidan was wonderful and quickly answered all my questions. On to the interview!

ME: The back of my book says, “Pamela Aidan has been a librarian for thirty years and a fan of Jane Austen even longer.” How long would that be?

Aidan: I read Pride & Prejudice in high school so that would be about 40 years ago!

ME: How did you manage to juggle your own Austen world and the one already revealed in Pride and Prejudice without sacrificing either Austen’s view of her story, or your own?

Aidan: Actually, except for a few elements, I had no “view” of the story. I was writing it piece by piece and posting it on the web at the Republic of Pemberley and the Derbyshire Writer’s Guild at first, and later on my own website as well. The process was more like waiting for Darcy to reveal himself as the events in P&P unrolled. So, I wrote with P&P open next to me, and as Darcy’s true character became clearer and clearer to me, my story evolved. I call my method “traipsing after Jane.”

ME: When did you begin to seriously ponder the goings-on of Fitzwilliam Darcy’s mind? And when did your thoughts transform into An Assembly Such as This?

Aidan:The process began with my first viewing of the BBC/A&E 1995 production of P&P. Previous adaptations to film or stage had either re-interpreted the story to the point of making it unrecognizable or the Darcy character as stiff and unemotional as a poker. The 1995 version, however, gave us a Darcy via Colin Firth who communicated a man whose emotional control was imperfect and hinted at great feeling. The idea that there was more to this character than I’d ever thought before presented itself to me. Then, there is the sea-change of character or at least of understanding when we meet Darcy at the end of P&P after a ½ book or more of absence from the plot.  Why did he change? How did he change? I wanted to know!  So, as an experiment I wrote a short 5 page peek at what might have been going on in Darcy’s mind as he wrote and then prepared to deliver the explanatory letter after Elizabeth’s rejection and posted it to The Republic of Pemberley. It was so well received that I then decided I would try to write the entire story from his perspective and, in so doing, find out those answers. So, I started in 1998 and finished writing Assembly in late 1999.

ME: When writing Duty and Desire, you obviously found yourself in a predicament. The time during which the novel takes place is completely Darcy-free in Pride and Prejudice (the physical Darcy, anyway), and you were left to complete conjecture. Did you appreciate this chance to thoroughly create your own plot-line, or did you miss the guidance of P&P? How was the outline/writing process different when writing Duty and Desire than it was when you wrote the other two books in the trilogy?

When I began Duty and Desire I was both excited to step away from “traipsing after Jane” and very, very apprehensive.  Here, after all, was the second test of my writing ability. The first had been whether I could write well enough to capture Austen and her characters in familiar surroundings. The second was whether I could launch off on my own, take the characters elsewhere, and the readers would follow.
I found that the solid grounding in Darcy’s character that I’d developed in writing Assembly, my research and familiarity with the historical period, and the temptations and revelations I wished Darcy and the reader to experience gave me the framework. This freedom made D&D fun to write. I had no outline, but wrote as it “came” to me, listening to Darcy tell me the story as I placed him in the conflicts of Norwycke Castle.

ME: I personally adored the characters you took more creative liberties with. Georgiana was intriguing and lovable. Lord Dyfed Brougham was mysterious and amazing. Did you feel you had a different author/character connection with these characters due to the fact that you had a chance to create their personalities?

Aidan: My relationship to Darcy and the characters I created or greatly expanded is very personal and akin to feelings for real people! Darcy started as the flawed hero/lover. By the end of Assemby he’d become like one of my children, a beloved son who I desperately hoped would overcome his flaws and turn out well. Some, like Fletcher, appeared full blown. Even I didn’t know how he’d come to be so fluent in Shakespeare until near the end of book three! Brougham & Georgianna are the major catalysts in the series after Elizabeth Bennet starts Darcy’s transformational process and thus had to be carefully constructed and revealed.  Their love for and frustration with Darcy mirror my own as he flails about trying to understand who he wants to be.
But their concern is compounded by their own difficulties in that quest as well. Their quests compel me to write.

ME: How many times would you say you’ve read Jane Austen’s novels, particularly Pride and Prejudice? Which novel, besides P&P, is your favorite?

I’ve probably read P&P around ten times just as a novel. When I was writing the series, it was always open next to me. So, I “studied” it almost daily. My second favorite Austen novel is Persuasion, and third is Mansfield Park, which I think has been largely misinterpreted, especially by modern readers, and therefore has never been dramatized correctly.

ME: Which is your favorite scene in your novels? If it is one of the scenes that is also in Pride and Prejudice, what would you say creates the different feel in your version, the one that entices you to love that scene so much?

My favorite scene takes place in book 3 at the Fox and Drake pub after Dy rescues Darcy from Sylvanie’s plot and coaxes a drunk and morose Darcy into finally confessing aloud the manner in which he has ruined his life. That scene explains the creation of the Brougham character. Who else could have called Darcy to account and force Darcy to listen; who else could Darcy bare his soul to but Dy?

ME: What response did you expect from readers when you packaged up your book and sent it out into the world? Were you worried your novel wouldn’t be appreciated or treated well because you’d based it on a novel so famous and beloved?

When my husband and I published our edition of Assembly we knew that it would do well enough to cover our expenses and make a little money. By that time I had developed my own website and was keeping track of the number of hits. There were thousands and from 101 different countries! I had a very loyal following on the internet and at the Republic of Pemberley and the Derbyshire Writers Guild, sites where fans will quickly tell writers if they are doing a good job or not. So, I knew it would be appreciated. What was stressful was when it appeared on Amazon and the non-fanfiction readers, janeites, and purists weighed in who had not read along during the years of posting bits and pieces online and seen the story develop. They did not tend to be amused by writers commandeering Austen. Although there were a few negative reviews, the response at Amazon was wonderfully positive. We sold around 10,000 copies of book one in a year! Duty and Desire did not fare as well in the reviews because of its divergence from Pride & Prejudice, but it sold quite well. These Three Remain is often referred to as the favorite of the three by readers. I believe that I’ve succeeded in extending Austen’s story and honoring her characters faithfully, which was always my intent, as presumptuous as it may sound—to me especially!

ME: Besides Darcy and Elizabeth, which character do you love most? Which do you think could use the most work?

Aidan: I love Dyfed Brougham the most. To be the friend that Darcy respects, the friend that can call Darcy out for foolishness or ill-behavior and be listened to is a man I want to know more about. The next book in the series will be as much his story as the Darcys’.  As for the others, having taken three books already to tell Darcy’s story, I think I’ve rounded out all the characters that need it.

ME: When writing, did you use certain objects or music to get you in the Austen/Darcy mind-set? How did you remain consistent with your voice, Austen’s, and Darcy’s?

Aidan: When I was writing the series, I often listened to Enya’s Paint the Sky with Stars album and Jerry Reed Smith’s albums of hammered dulcimer music (Strayaway Child is his first) to get me in the mind-set. A hot cup of Earl Grey tea and some buttered toast also helped! I’m a morning person, so the dark and solitude of early morning is very conducive.

As for consistency of voice, I couldn’t say. Mostly, I just waited to “hear” Darcy speak to me in the dark, quiet solitude of early morning.


You can buy all of Aidan’s books at (and a bunch of other places).

Thanks for taking a look!

October 1st, 2009

An Assembly Such as This by Pamela Aidan; Review

by Madeleine Rex

An Assembly Such as This

Title: An Assembly Such as This

Author: Pamela Aiden

Published: 2006 by Simon & Schuster

Number of Pages: 288

Rating: 4/5



His pacing brought him to the bookshelf, and with hopes that the discipline involved in following the course of a battle would restore his thoughts to order, he plucked Fuentes de Oñorofrom its place and dropped into a chair by the fire. Stretching out his legs to the hearth, he slid his finger along the pages and opened the book to the place held for him by the embroidery threads. As he bent to read, the words blurred in his vision, cast into incomprehensibility by the glint of the firelight on the knotted strands of silk that lay across his page. Elizabeth! How he had resisted every thought of her! His breath quickened as a flood of memories overpowered his mind: Elizabeth at the door of Netherfield, hesitant but determined; on the stair, tired, but faithful in the care of her sister; in the drawing room, with arched brow challenging his character; at the pianoforte, unconscious of the grace she had brought to her song; at the ball, Milton’s Eve, sparkling of eye, suffused with Edenic loveliness.


Before I plunge into the depths of Austenesque thoughts and a review abounding with praise and in sore need of criticsm, I must disclose some information on my own reading guidelines: 1) I hardly ever, under any circumstances, read a book set in the 19th century written by a living, breathing, and quite present author, and 2) I never read books that have coveted another author’s characters.

Are you sensing a “but”?

But… I have succumbed to Pamela Aidan’s irrefutably seductive powers (and the united persuasion of my mother and her friend). It seems all my standards regarding books have been thrown in with the slushy, pungent contents of the dumpster that loyally visits my cul-de-sac every Wednesday morning and slowly tossed and turned until they were completely contaminated. They have no hop

Not only does Pamela Aidan’s book “take” Jane Austen’s characters, it “takes” her most prominent, beloved, and intriguing characters and love story—Fitzwilliam Darcy, his seemingly unsuitable suitor, Elizabeth Bennet and their troubling journey as they struggle to allow their instinctive balance to abandon them and consequently leave them with no choice but to finally relinquish their “pride and prejudice” and fall in love—like every one of their dedicated fans begged them to from the infamous “She is tolerable; but not handsome enough to tempt me”.

The purpose Aidan’s Fitzwilliam Darcy, Gentleman series serves is one that I’m sure has been the very one consuming every Pride & Prejudice fanatic’s mind since its publication—While our dear Eliza was pondering over Mr. Darcy’s pride, Mr. Wickham’s mistreatment, and the well-being of her beloved sisters, how was “Fitz” Darcy dawdling away his time? What could possibly trouble the days of a man worth an awe-inspiring ten thousand a year?

An Assembly Such as This invades the Austen world a minute before the ground-breaking appearance of Mr. Charles Bingley at the public ball in Hertfordshire. Mr. Darcy’s immediate thoughts are certainly not the most pleasant, focusing on the inevitable tediousness of the impending evening.

And, suddenly, we’re engulfed by the story we’ve grown to love, from the perspective of the man we love but, until now, have never understood. His mind has remained a mystery to us; the passings and goings of his thoughts, incomprehensible. We’re startled by the clarity with which we learn to view his character. The idea that we could guess what the secretive Mr. Darcy—whose actions heretofore seemed to be acted without any premeditation, due to his discreet facial expressions—would say, do, or think next abruptly becomes possible, as opposed to ridiculously hopeful.

An Assembly Such as This is merely the first installment in the Fitzwilliam Darcy, Gentleman trilogy. It is only a partial account of Darcy’s goings on behind the Pride & Prejudice scene. And, although anyone who even contemplates reading this book is most definitely “in the know” in regards to the plot of P&P, you bid the book adieu with an uncharacteristic jumpiness and unsettled appearance, your hands twitching impatiently to flip through the pages of the second book in the trilogy (which I finished today), Duty and Desire.

Now for the question nagging your mind, what is Pamela Aidan compared to Jane Austen? Compared to the woman known by the entire book-loving population? While I can’t deny the fact that Aidan’s voice is slightly different from Austen’s (and that, I’m sure, is partially due to the fact that she is writing from Darcy’s point of view, not Elizabeth’s), Aidan is, to phrase it lightly, right up there with Austen. Her vocabulary is similar to that of what you would expect of a woman born and raised in the 19th (or 18th, as with Austen) century. Austen’s original characters are not lost in the new braids of the story, and the additional characters never mentioned in P&P, acquaintances of Mr. Darcy’s, could most definitely have been dreamed up by Austen herself. What most impressed me, however, in Aidan’s portrayal, was the dialogue. Inevitably, a portion of the dialogue was quoted directly from P&P, in the crucial scenes from the original book, but much of it was of Aidan’s own creation, and just as witty, true to the character, and entertaining as Austen’s. I have never been so impressed in my life. I have encountered authors I adore more (Pamela Aidan is indubitably one of my favorites, though, and likely to retain that position), Aidan has achieved what I thought impossible: She has successfully become a truly Austenesque author. She has quite literally written “the rest of Pride & Prejudice”.

I whole-heartedly recommend this novel. My review of the second installment in the trilogy is forthcoming, and I’m certain my admiration will be more adamantly expressed then. Luckily, the basics have been spoken of here, and I will be free to speak more on the plotline (which is surprisingly… surprising). I’m eager to write about it now, but tomorrow will do just as well!  (EDIT: Here’s the review-)

Thanks, Pamela Aidan, for a book that’s caused my insides to do myriad things: flip excitedly, twitch and shiver apprehensively, and calmly settle contentedly.